The Geek Rants on Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness









 
The Documents of Liberty

The Declaration of Independence

The Constitution

The Bill of Rights

The 1982 Senate RKBA Report

2004 DOJ Memo: 2A Is An Individual Right

A Critical Guide To The Second Amendment (Tennessee Law Review (1995))

UNDER FIRE: THE NEW CONSENSUS ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT (Barnett & Cates, 1996)

Firearms and the Fourteenth Amendment

The unabridged Second Amendment

Classic RKBA Essays:

Ethics From The Barrel of A Gun
A Nation of Cowards




Important Stuff:

The McCain-Feingold Insurrection

a human right

Worthy Stuff:

Jeff Cooper's Commentaries
Farnam's Quips

Dave Kopel
John Lott
National Review Online
Good Guys Win
Keep and Bear Arms
Gun Owners of America
The NRA
GunCite

Give Us this Day, My Daily Blogs:

Bill Whittle
The Other Side of Kim
The Smallest Minority
Publicola
Says Uncle

Fun Stuff:

Sluggy Freelance
Cox and Forkum
Day By Day

Hangouts

The High Road
The New Jersey Coalition for Self Defense

Contact
email me

What Folks Are Saying About Me:
"Your blog has ruled of late. It's like reading the diary of a madman"

"Best of" Index
Quintessential Geek

Blogroll:










 
Archives
<< current 03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003 04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003 05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008 03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008 04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008 05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008














< >
Musings of The GeekWithA.45
 
Monday, January 30, 2006  

Want Your Own Pile of Heavily Armed Friends?





Go check out The Rally Point.org, with new forums geared towards "encouraging the legal ownership of firearms by responsible adults and the furthering of education to keep our country safe".

Brought to you by Soda Pop aka Jamie Young, organizer of the shoots at which the group photo was taken, and a dashing group of folks that sporadically includes yours truly.


Learn. Teach. Bring newbies to the range. It's all good.


:)



.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Saturday, January 28, 2006  

Bill Whittle Explains His Absence...



At his site.


Lately, I'd been thinking that he's been gone so long that the only acceptable apology would be that he was A) dead or B)captured by the slavering moonbats, and in dire need of rescue.

His explanation is neither of those, but I find it gratifying, and am inclined to accept it.

Bill: Carry On. {And don't embarass us.}


.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 

All Work And No Play...



Makes the geek a dull boy. Dull, as in I'm so busy that in order to get any progress in any front, I've had to timeslice myself so thin that I'm in danger of rendering myself stupid.

Therefore, I spent a few minutes playing with The motivator generator, and offer you the results:










And now, back to my previously scheduled insanity.

{h/t: thr::kentucky_smith}

.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Tuesday, January 24, 2006  

Stick a Fork in Jersey. It's Finished



Iris scanning for grade schoolers



'Nuff said.


Well, not quite enough.


A) Never provide anyone with a motive to scoop your, or your kid's eyeballs out of your skull by allowing your iris to be photographed in such a biometric system.

B) Although there are certain situations, such as picking up your kid where showing ID might be appropriate, for example, if the secretary doesn't recognize you on sight, you are not under any obligation to let them copy or magswipe your id.

Sure, they'll bitch, moan and whine about their polllllicies, and how they can't release the kid without a record of to whom the kid was released,, and that it's for your child's own good, you ignorant redneck but that's actually BULLSHIT. Your parental rights trump their policies in a nanosecond, and refusing to hand over the kid after you've identified yourself is felony kidnapping.

But, of course, if you live in Jersey, you're completely unable to do anything about felonious kidnapping of your children other than lodge a complaint, because you're unarmed.


I also predict that life sized, laminated, full color iris keychains of random people are going to be popular.



.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 

Corzine is so full of it...



After an inauguration speech pledging to cleanup corruption in NJ, he appoints Zulima Farber as State AG


Highlights:

-Passed over for NJ supreme court nomination (Slot earmarked for different minority, plus outstanding bench warrant.)

-Little experience as a prosecutor

-30 traffic tickets, license suspended 3 times

-$60,000 (!!!) contribution to Democratic party over the years

-Record of gun bigotry

-THR member Calrodd heard that

Quote:
---------------
new NJ attorney general advocates more gun control....and wait till you hear why


i just saw this story on my local philadelphia news. i'm trying to find the transcript on-line, but no luck so far.

zulima farber has just been appointed by new (D)Gov. Jon Corzine to be NJ state attorney general. she intends to pursue even more aggressive gun control, and guess why. some years ago she was robbed at knife point. as the man was running away, she said to herself, "boy i wish i had a gun....i would shoot him in the back."

i can't think of anything else to say.
---------------


Update!

THR Member Blue Jays finds the quote:
-----------------
Farber also was questioned repeatedly about her views on handguns and mandatory minimum sentences. She testified that her views on gun control came into focus during her first week on the job as assistant counsel to Byrne. Farber had just returned to her apartment in North Brunswick when a teenage boy mugged her in the apartment's parking lot. She said the boy put a knife to her throat before taking her wallet and running away.

"My first thought was, 'I wish I had a gun, I would shoot him in the back,'" Farber said. "That scared me to death. I don't believe people should run around with guns. The police should have guns."
------------------


Considering that Corzine has pledged " I will never settle for less than excellence.", and a state and nationwide search for the best people, this was the best he could find?

Dudes....run for your freaking lives.

[Amityville Horror]

Get....out!

[/Amityville Horror]

.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Monday, January 23, 2006  

I Listened To This Man Speak For Over An Hour This Morning...



On C-Span radio while I rode down to HQ. Here's the news report, which simply does not do what the man had to say justice.

For the sake of argument, I'm going to extend to him the courtesy of presuming that he was not in a state of pants flambe'.

During the course of this hour, he patiently explained, in as much detail as he could without giving away method and means, what the NSA does, and does not do, what their criterion is, and what the limitation of their lawful authority is, both before and after 9/11.

He then fielded questions from reporters, who did their very best to twist his words about.

I couldn't find a transcript, but but this will lead you to the link to the Real Media.


Listen firsthand, and judge for yourself.

Readers are urged to listen to at least an hour of C-Span a week, to get direct knowledge of what's being said concerning the events of the day, so that they can form their own opinions without introduction of bias on the part of the press.

Firsthand encounter with the root documentation is always eye opening.


.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Sunday, January 22, 2006  

"California, Here We Come!"



Jed over @ Freedomsight posts up a scan of an ad for the Barrett .416



:)

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 

ARGH!



Opera crashed, and took this post with it.

Rather than blow an hour reconstructing it in prose form, I present it in powerpoint format:


{click}



  • I haven't ranted about NJ in a while.

    • 3 topics came together this weekend that inspire me to do so now.


    {click}

  • My father in law & his girlfriend are leaving NJ.

    • They're blue collar types nearing retirement

    • They aren't nearly as tuned into the issues as Readers here

    • I find it fascinating that the type of folks who were once the backbone of the Democratic party are bailing the liberal utopia in droves.




    {click}

  • While repairing the upstairs TV, I listened to pundits react to Corzine's inauguration speech{barf alert}

  • The following factors add up to much more than a hint in tax increases:


    • "I know my friends in the Legislature understand fiscal and tax questions are explosive – but the time for procrastination is past.

      The decisions should be taken; the tough choices made. Let us seize this moment and meet our challenges. We have no other choice."

    • And though this is a time of austerity, we must find the tools and the resources to fulfill our most fundamental commitments, starting with our commitment to our...{social programs}

    • As Governor Codey said in November, his transition report can be summed up simply: “the state is pretty much broke.”


  • Geek's Quickdraw Analysis: NJ is screwed.




  • {click}


  • The rest I'm going to save for another day, because it really deserves a thoughtful post in prose.


  • {click}


Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 

What I'd Like To Make at the Winchester Plant

from Egregious Charles

The Winchester plant in Connecticut is up for sale. If I could buy it, I have some ideas for lever-action guns.

First is a Model 94 line designed as a trunk gun. I'd have stainless steel or parkerized metal options and laminate or synthetic stock options to protect against trunk moisture. I'd also make speedloaders for the tubular magazine, so it could be carried empty but loaded or topped off quicker than currently. I'd have some slight design changes to better accommodate the speedloaders. Large aperture ring sights would be an option, and forward scope mounts a la Scout rifles.

I'd add a new chambering, .460 S&W Magnum, which is a lengthened .454 Casull, so it could handle .460, .454, and .45 LC. That would take you all the way from anti-grizzly power to relatively inexpensive plinker (inexpensive compared to bear-capable cartridges); the .460 could match the .45-70 out of a rifle, at least with medium and light bullets. A chambering that could take .410 gauge shotshells and one or more of the .45LC line might be worth looking at too.

With a forward red-dot sight and hot .45LC or mild .454 Casull loads, it'd make an outstanding brush gun for deer.

I'd also like to make something more radical; an odd lever-action designed as a survival gun or a first rifle for someone who, like many new shooters who haven't found the joy yet, intended it as their only rifle.

It would be designed from the ground up as a .22 rimfire/.223 Remington convertible. Most of the barrel would stay, but the chamber and part of the barrel throat would be interchangeable; those would be an assembly with the magazine well and a good chunk of the receiver, and a separate bolt face/extractor/firing pin assembly. The rifling on the throat and barrel parts would be indexed to match. The bolt would be cut out underneath for the hammer to be under the closed bolt, to allow a short, simple firing pin arrangement inside the bolt face assembly. The mag well would be on the left side, as in the Sten, Johnson LMG, or FG42, because the hammer would be where the magazine should go otherwise. It would accept AR-type .223 magazines, and I haven't decided what kind of .22 magazines; probably Ruger rotary as the least obtrusive when sideways. The bolt might angle or curve upward to clear the shooting-hand thumb. Lots of aluminum (especially in the rimfire receiver section), stainless, and synthetic; there's no way to make it look traditional so make it look modern. The same idea with a conventionally placed mag well and hammer and normal long firing pin is also possible.

The advantages for new shooters are:
1) Lever guns are really fun.
2) .22 LR is very cheap and easy to practice with.
3) In one gun you get a great training gun and a not-too-bad goblin gun.

For a one-gun survival gun:
1) Manual-loaders can handle any sort of cartridge power with no adjustment.
2) .22 LR is a great survival cartridge.
3) .223 Remington/5.56 NATO is going to be the easiest combat cartridge to acquire and carry in quantity; as a survival gun that overrides the lack of power.
4) The light weight of the conversion parts would be easy to carry.

If anybody uses these ideas, and if they make lots of money doing it, send me a free gun and I'll be repaid.

Permalink

Posted By: EgregiousCharles


Friday, January 20, 2006  

Stopping Power and Cartridge Selection Philosophy

from Egregious Charles

There are two main schools of thought on bullet stopping power
A) the Marshall/Sanow school, which bases it's theories on shooting statistics, and favors fast, massive-expansion bullets at the expense of weight.
B) and the Fackler/IWBA school, which bases it's theories on medicine, and favors heavier, controlled-expansion bullets at the expense of speed.

I've seen quite a bit of criticism of the Marshall/Sanow statistics. The problem I noticed personally was that percent stops were frequently based on statistically inadequate sample sets; for example, one loading would be rated a 90% stopper based on 10 shootings with 1 failure, and another would be rated an 80% stopper based on 10 shootings with 2 failures. The distinction between 1 and 2 failures isn't enough to base a probability on, it could be just luck. That doesn't affect the overall conclusion for fast loadings, because there's lots of aggregate data for that. Another thing is that it doesn't correct for bullet placement in the torso, which affects statistics in that certain calibers/loadings are used more by better trained users so have better placements, or they are used more at closer range so have better placements, etc. Other criticisms I've seen include accusations of outright fraud, which obviously would affect all conclusions.

The Fackler/IWBA school advocates deep penetration for exsanguination or massive CNS damage as the only medically predictable ways of producing incapacitation with a handgun. (Exsanguination in this context is creating a wound that bleeds enough to lower blood pressure to the point of incapacitation.) My criticism of that is that exsanguination is so slow as to be mostly useless in most of the fights that might affect civilians; under ideal circumstances with optimistic estimates it might take as little as 15 seconds to incapacitate. If the other guy is shooting and you must wait 15 seconds for him to stop, you might as well persuade him to take up smoking and wait for cancer to kill him.

Forebrain damage sometimes fails to stop too. You can only be medically confident that an attacker will stop shooting immediately if the nerves of his hands are disconnected from his brain, say by a severed spine above the shoulders. But spine hits are going to be a matter of luck for most of us. Lots of us could hit the spine marked on a stationary paper target, or the centerline of the target where the spine would be, but very few could hit the spine on a target where the center isn't marked, the target is moving even a little, and it's not facing us exactly. For the lower spine, the ribs and sternum will easily deflect any normal handgun bullet enough to make a spine hit luck for those who can hit it.

Handgun effects in general are not medically predictable. Anecdotes of people functioning after taking many hits with any common small arm exist, including light or heavy .45 ACP, .357 Magnum, my favorite the 10mm Auto, and even serious rifles like 8mm Mauser and .30-06. You might as well ignore those anecdotes, or you're going to have to carry a Flak 88. What you're betting on is that people usually stop attacking when shot for reasons that aren't fully understood. And when it comes down to that, actually there isn't all that much difference between any of the popular calibers.

The primary criteria for cartridge selection are, therefore:
1) Is the cartridge small enough to allow a gun that you'll have at hand when you need it?
2) Is it comfortable and cheap enough that you'll practice with it?

Stopping power is secondary; chose the most powerful that fits the above criteria. In my case I was willing to adjust my clothing and deal with a big gun, I like recoil, and I had (at the time) plenty of money for ammo, so I chose 10mm Auto; but it's not a good choice for most.

Now here's where I'm going to get controversial. The most overemphasized and least important criterion, in my opinion, is the ability for rapid follow-up shots. It's a side effect of practicing with stationary paper. I've rarely heard a shooting story where the shooters stand still and trade shots. As soon as you are not merely making your body a machine rest to return the gun to the same position and alignment as before, but actually changing aim for a target that moved or a new target, or you are moving, recoil becomes unimportant. Here's something to try; hang two targets right next to each other, and alternate shots between them. Try it with high and low recoil guns, or the same gun with high and low recoil cartridges if you can. In my experience, suddenly recoil becomes nearly irrelevant. Features like the gun's sight visibility and the subjective feeling of pointability are the really important ones there.

For lots of good information on specific cartridges, check the Anarchangel's discussion here.

Permalink

Posted By: EgregiousCharles


 

So, What's Under Your Eotech Holosight?





It would make one heck of a trunk gun.

I wonder if they make it in semi, so I can skip all the NFA paperwork?

Oh, wait. 30mm > 50 cal = destructive device.

Sigh. I guess it's worth the $200 tax, and paperwork headaches.


Now, if I could just find that treasure chest full of diamonds I buried in the backyard when I was 8, so I could pay for it....

;)




Update!

By popular demand, I've dug out more information on that beasty. It's a General Dynamics GAU 19 12.7mm gatling gun.

Being .50 cal, it's not inherently a DD, and therefore a semi-auto version would be available to well heeled citizens (outside CA, assuming 12.7 = .50 bmg) on a NICS check. :)



.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Thursday, January 19, 2006  

Breaking News...



Bin Laden wants to attack.

{yawn}

Maybe I'll swap out the politically correct trunk gun for the AR.

Maybe not.


.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Monday, January 16, 2006  

I've Always Said That TV Rots Your Brain...




Now, apparently, it wilts your, er, libido too.


{h/t: Drudge}


.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Saturday, January 14, 2006  

A Studied Contrast...



Let's take a look at two bits of advertising graphics.

They're both from the same company.

They're both for the same product.

The only difference is that one is from the 1960's, and the other is from today.

 


Advertising graphics are some of the most deeply scrutinized pixels there are, being the product of a robust feedback process between the graphical artist, the client, and the target audience.

Something very profound is illuminated in this contrast.

These images were both made to appeal to the same very specific audience, and to a certain extent, reflects how that audience sees itself. Although not hidden from the public, these images were never expected to be widely distributed.


One of these things is not like the others,
One of these things just doesn't belong,
Can you tell which thing is not like the others
By the time I finish my song?

Did you guess which thing was not like the others?
Did you guess which thing just doesn't belong?
If you guessed this one is not like the others,
Then you're absolutely...right!


(Words and Music by Joe Raposo and Jon Stone)


{Thanks to THR::Harry Tuttle for digging up the 60's ad}
.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 

You Know You've Been Watching WAY Too Much C-Span When...




You open a business meeting by declaring, "The question before this body is one of utmost importantance to the future of the re...public, er, topic at hand."



.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Thursday, January 12, 2006  

Schadenfreude...



I don't normally partake of schadenfreude.

But I do regularly make exceptions for certain US Senators.

This one made my day.





{h/t::Drudge}

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 

Let There Be NO DOUBT in ANYONE's mind...



That the New York Times is indeed the Democrat's tame lapdog.

Here's their editorial opinion on Alito

It tracks precisely 1 to 1 on the well coordinated Democratic smears that I listened to during the proceedings.

Time and again, the Dem questioners politely insinuated that Alito was guilty of the things this editorial charges him with, and time and again, Alito calmly explained why those assertions don't stick.

The way it works is like this, and I'm cutting through all the bullshit to get to the heart of the matter.

Dem Questioner: "You're an extremist, aren't you?"
Alito: "Nope. {coherent and rational explanation why not.}

Dem Questioner: "You're a mysogynist, aren't you?"
Alito: "Nope. {coherent and rational explanation why not.}

Dem Questioner: "You're a racist, aren't you?"
Alito: "Nope. {coherent and rational explanation why not.}

Dem Questioner: "AAAAAAAGH! You want to overturn Roe!"
Alito: "Not necessarilly. {coherent and rational explanation why not.}

Dem Questioner: "You're a liar, aren't you?"
Alito: "Nope. {coherent and rational explanation why not.}

Dem Questioner: "You don't care about the little guy, do you."
Alito: "Nope. {coherent and rational explanation why not.}


Dem Questioner: "You've got a track record of finding for big biz, haven't you?"
Alito: "Nope. {coherent and rational explanation why not.}

Dem Questioner: "You refuse to allow me to paint you into my ideological corner, right?"
Alito: "Correct. And I'm right to do so."


New York Times:

"Alito describes self as extreme, mysogynist, racist, lying, Roe overturning, crush the little guy so big biz can oppress the poor meany."


No fair minded person who had listened to any significant chunk of the testimony would reach the conclusions the New York Times has.

.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 

Quick Reflection On Alito Hearings...



I've spent more than my usual amount of time on the road, which means I've listened to large chunks of the Alito hearings. I'm short of time, but I wanted to blast out some thoughts.

* JFC. Would somebody please inform everyone else on all sides of the issue that Roe v. Wade is not the end-all-be-all of Supreme Court jurisprudence? The amount of time, effort, thought and attention expended on that topic is nauseating. Considering that the Bill of Rights is in tatters, and our grasp on ENUMERATED rights is tenuous, it's unconscionable.

* Speaking of nauseating, anytime Joe Biden speaks, I eventually wind up shouting obscenities in his general direction. The dude's a snake.

* Don't even get me started on the Drunken Whaler of Chappaquidic.


* Sam Alito sounds promising. He's repeatedly said that the Constitution does two things: lay out a structure of governance, and protects the rights of people. He asserts that it is "innappropriate and not useful" to look to foreign law in interpreting our Constitution. He understands that the 14th ammendment had been torturously misapplied for 60 years past Reconstruction. I almost fell out of my seat when he started sounding like Randy Barnett. (rough quote from memory) "The Constitution means something, and to understand it, we have to look to the text of the document and the commonly understood at the time meanings of the words."


Promising indeed.



.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Wednesday, January 11, 2006  

Annoying Comments Still Legal

(from EgregiousCharles)

It appears I was wrong about the illegal annoying comments thing.

The thing is, 47 USC 223(h)(1)(B) excludes 'interactive computer service' as defined by 47 USC 230(f)(2), which pretty much seems to cover comments.

Basically it appears that it makes telephone harrassment cover VOIP.

Thanks, Justin Buist whose comment led eventually to Cal Lanier.

Permalink

Posted By: EgregiousCharles


 

Kevin Fisks!



And There Will Be Chocolate Rivers, and Fluffy Bunnies...


Kevin, tired and toasty, rousts himself to once again charge into the breach and perform the endless, mighty work of free men.

He begins by making this point, with which I heartily concur:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I'll be honest with you, I'm about burned out. I now fully understand Toren Smith's reason for pulling the plug on The Safety Valve. It's fatigue. The idiotarians never give up. Shine the light of fact on them, and they may scurry away like cockroaches, or they might just stand and stare like deer into headlights, but you can't get through to them. Their vision of utopia precludes any attempt to make them face reality, up to and including a severe beating about the head and shoulders with a ClueBat. It's exhausting. Especially when they're paid to be idiotarians, and we in the real world have to earn a living and refute them on our own time.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Hang in there bro.




.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Tuesday, January 10, 2006  

Peanut Allergy…



As I'm on the plane to Vegas via Pittsburgh, I'm replaying a scene in my mind from earlier in the week. I'd overheard a conversation between the folks next to me in line @ the ice cream place, as a grandmother loudly proclaimed that her grand daughter had a pea NUT allergy and that the ice cream crew was not to use anything that had touched peanuts.

I said nothing, but I was skeptical. Severe peanut reactions should be a very rare thing, and whenever some medical oddity makes the news, it becomes trendy and over diagnosed. As I munch my peanuts, I wonder how prevalent the problem really is.

Perhaps a half an hour later, the twenty something girl who is sitting two seats over pops a benadryl, and hesitantly reaches across the empty seat between us.

"Please excuse me", she says, tugging on my sleeve. "How long until we land? I have a peanut allergy, and my lips are tingling. I'm afraid I might be starting to have a reaction."

My eyes widen a bit. When genuine, peanut reactions can be catastrophic. "What's the consequence for you? Anaphylactic?" The pretty girl nods. "My face will swell, starting with my lips. Would you mind keeping an eye on me, in case I lose consciousness?"

My mind races, reviewing everything I know about anaphylactic reactions. She'd taken a benadryl, that was good, might head things off at the pass. If it went any further, she'd need an epi-pen, and if that didn't stop the reaction, she might lose her airway. We're at 20,000 feet, and at least 30 minutes from landing. I pat my pocket, and look over to my bag. I normally have blades in my pocket and forceps in my toolkit, which I could improvise to perform an emergency tracheotomy. I'd read the technique in detail a few years back, and always kept it tucked into the back of my mind. It's a dramatic procedure that can unfortunately be mistaken for attempted murder. It can save a life, in just this situation.

My blades are in checked baggage, and I left my toolkit at home. Shit, shit shit.

"Please, tell me you have an epi-pen in your purse?" The girl nods, and smiles, reassured that I have a clue about what is going on.

"How do you know about this? Are you a doctor?" I admit that I am not, that I'm a mad scientist by trade, and that means that I'm more or less a really smart guy who knows stuff.

I mentally inventory my flying kit of innocuously sharp and pointy things. I have a tube to hold an airway open, but the bladesque items are better suited for making large, ragged holes in terrorists than they would be at the task of making the necessary delicate incisions.

As we chat amiably, I mentally review the sequence of events that will happen if things go south. If her lips start to swell, I will alert her, and she'll use the epi-pen. If she cannot, I will administer it for her. I will also need to command the attention of the cabin, and quickly find out if anyone aboard the plane has better medical credentials than my Boy Scout first aid merit badge plus spotty, idiosyncratic medical training. Failing that, I will need to quickly obtain better blades, because the odds of success plummet if I have to use those in my improvised flying kit. I'm hoping that the plane's first aid kit is more than a box of band aids.

God damn the bullshit pseudo security.

I mentally rehearse the best way to get the resources I need without causing undue alarm, or getting myself tackled as a bad guy. A loud, clear and commanding, "Please excuse me. There is a medical emergency. I need the first aid kit, and a doctor or EMT over here NOW." ought to obtain the desired results.

We talk, and shortly the plane begins its decent into Pittsburgh. The girl's lips do not swell, and all is well. She departs cheerfully, happy to be home, and lavishes her thanks on me.

I need better flying blades.

There's a lot of really good reasons to have a blade on you at all times.




.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 

In Full Accordance With My Standing Official Policy...



Outlined here,, and expanded upon here,

Anyone who finds my posts to be "annoying" is cordially invited to get stuffed.



That is all.



.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Monday, January 09, 2006  

Annoying Anonymous Comments Illegal

(from EgregiousCharles)

What is wrong with these people!

Via SaysUncle here, it's illegal to annoy people anonymously by means of the Internet, including comments.

Apparently this passed the House by voice vote and the Senate unanimously. They pass so freaking many laws that are so freaking complicated, I suspect most of them approved on the word of some intern. The offending text is,

SEC. 113. PREVENTING CYBERSTALKING.

(a) In General- Paragraph (1) of section 223(h) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 223(h)(1)) is amended--

(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking `and' at the end;

(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting `; and'; and

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

`(C) in the case of subparagraph (C) of subsection (a)(1), includes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet (as such term is defined in section 1104 of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note)).'.

(b) Rule of Construction- This section and the amendment made by this section may not be construed to affect the meaning given the term `telecommunications device' in section 223(h)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as in effect before the date of the enactment of this section.


Which basically is intended to extend protection against harrassing phone calls to the 'Net, but effectively makes annoying anonymous comments prosecutable.

Permalink

Posted By: EgregiousCharles


Wednesday, January 04, 2006  

Bloggus Sporadicus...



I'm going to be on the road for the next weekish, so blogging on my part will be sporadic, if at all.




.

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Tuesday, January 03, 2006  

Can any government be justified?

from EgregiousCharles

Question: If taxes are theft, and no-one can be considered bound by a social contract that they're not a signatory to, why have any government at all?

Answer: Because if you don't have one of your own, someone else will give you one.

I'm an anarcho-capitalist in the same way I'm a pacifist; that is, I'll become one at the same time as everyone else. It's moral position seems as unassailable as that of pacifism. So if either one were a realistic option at all, it'd be the only option. But with pacifism, in the real world, there are too many situations where refusing to participate in violence does nothing to reduce violence, but simply makes it one sided.

Likewise, the organization provided by a government, in terms of mobilization and concentration of force, is such an advantage in war that not having a government is not a realistic option. If America tried, the American anarchy would be "civilized" forcibly, in bite-sized chunks, by other nations that wouldn't think of facing a tax-supported American army; for example, Mexico would take the Southwest back (probably a bit at a time, maybe starting with Southern California), and I'd be surprised if North Korea didn't start with Seattle. While I believe strongly in the value of resistance provided by private arms, an invading government would basically get to decide how many individuals they wanted to face at once. The number of individuals willing to commit to individual heroic last stands is very small; the number of people that would be willing to die for an organized resistance that had some collective chance of success is much higher.

According to Thomas Jefferson, some of the American Indian tribes he encountered were led by a man's personal charisma and did not have a structured enforcement system; as close to anarchy as is in recorded history. But that's why they could not stand for long against anyone more organized, even later when they'd acquired equivalent armament.

We are going to be governed; our only option is to treat it like violence: only when unavoidable.

Permalink

Posted By: EgregiousCharles


 

"The Retreat of Reason"...



I'm still reading this 100 page indictment of Political Correctivism, The Retreat of Reason: Political Correctness and the Corruption of Public Debate in Modern Britain (pdf) by Anthony Brown, but I wanted to get it out to y'all.

The Author Summarizes His Work Thus:
------------------------------------
Summary

For centuries Britain has been a beacon of liberty of thought, belief and speech in the world, but now its intellectual and political life is in chains.


Members of the public, academics, journalists and politicians are afraid of thinking certain thoughts. People are vilified if they publicly diverge from accepted beliefs, sacked or even investigated by police for crimes against received wisdom. Whole areas of debate have been closed down by the crushing dominance of the moralistic ideol-ogy of political correctness.


Political correctness started as a study of cultural Marxism in Germany in the 1920s, and was adopted by the 1960s counter culture, eager to promote tolerance and alternatives to the conservative values of the time.


Political correctness quickly infiltrated US academia and spread its tentacles across the West. By the early twenty-first century, political correctness had completed its long march through the institutions in Britain, and had ensnared almost all of them, from schools to hospitals, from local government to national government, and from major corporations to the police, army and the church. In 1997, Britain became governed for the first time by a government largely controlled by politically-correct ideol-ogy.



Its influence has spread across the entire policy range, not just women’s pay and race relations, but education, health, law and order and the environment. It is upheld by a powerful array of lobby groups, from Liberty to Amnesty International, from Friends of the Earth to Refu-gee Action, and an array of domestic and international laws, charters and treaties.

Starting as a reaction to the dominant ideology, it has become the dominant ideology. It defines the terms and parameters of any national debate. Anything that is not PC is automatically controversial. Across much of the public sphere, it has replaced reason with emotion, subordinating objective truth to subjective virtue.



In the early days, political correctness brought benefits as it helped spread decency and consideration to the more vulnerable members of society, from the handicapped to women to ethnic minorities.



But, as political correctness spread and deepened its influence, it became more dogmatic and intolerant of dissent, until it became a betrayal of the very liberalism that first fuelled it. It has lead to new political censorship laws being introduced to curb freedom of speech, and membership of legal democratic parties being curtailed. Rather than opening minds, it is closing them down.



The aim of political correctness is to redistribute power from the powerful to the powerless. It automatically and unquestioningly supports those it deems victims, irres-pective of whether they merit it, and opposes the powerful, irrespective of whether they are malign or benign. For the politically correct, the West, the US and multinational corporations can do no good, and the developing world can do no wrong.


Political correctness is often ridiculed, but it is more than just a joke. With its earlier benefits already won, it has now become a hindrance to social progress, and a threat to society. By closing down debates, it restricts the ability of society to tackle the problems that face it.



PC promoted multiculturalism in the Netherlands while silencing debate about its drawbacks, until the results exploded in religious violence leaving much of the country living in fear. In Britain, it allowed the creation of alien-ated Muslim ghettoes which produce young men who commit mass murder against their fellow citizens. By promoting the rights of criminals over their victims, it hinders law enforcement and leads to escalating crime. By challenging the authority of teachers, it fuels poor discipline in schools, and by promoting equality over excellence, it degrades the standard of education and inflates exam grades until they become almost mean-ingless.



By silencing debate and curbing objective analysis, political correctness can harm those it intends to help. The victims are taught to blame others for their vulnerability, discouraging them from taking responsibility for improv-ing their lives if their problems are self-inflicted.



Black communities are encouraged to blame racist teachers for the failure of their boys at school, rather than re-examine their own culture and attitudes to education that may be the prime reasons. The poor sick have ended up having worse healthcare in Britain than they would in mainland Europe because PC for long closed down debate on fundamental NHS reform. Women’s employment opportunities can be harmed by giving them ever more rights that are not given to men. The unemployed are encouraged to languish on benefits blaming others for their fate. Poor Africans are condemned to live in poverty so long as they and their governments are encouraged to blame the West for all their problems, rather than confronting the real causes of poor governance, corruption and poor education.



Political correctness once had a purpose, but it now causes much more harm than good. For the last few decades, reason has been in retreat—but the time has come for reason to advance once again.


------------------------------------

[Neo]
Whoa.
[/Neo]

{h/t thr::gc70}

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


Sunday, January 01, 2006  

Hey, Artoo! {Bleep.} Go On Patrol. {Bleep, Bloop.}





Happy New Year!



:)

Permalink

Posted By: geekWithA.45


 
This page is powered by 

Blogger.